- From: Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:28:25 +0100
- To: "Tillett, Barbara" <btil@loc.gov>
- Cc: "'Karen Coyle'" <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, public-lld <public-lld@w3.org>
If you're willing to make any personal, hypothetical comments representing only yourself as an individual, that would be useful, too, Barbara! If not, that's ok, too! -Jodi On 28 Mar 2011, at 16:48, Tillett, Barbara wrote: > I may not make a statement for the Library of Congress. - Barbara > > -----Original Message----- > From: Karen Coyle [mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net] > Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 12:11 PM > To: Tillett, Barbara > Cc: public-lld > Subject: RE: Ideas for Recommendations for Report > > Quoting "Tillett, Barbara" <btil@loc.gov>: > >> >> I'd also love to see suggestions for a MARC replacement and that >> process. - bt > > Barbara, can you provide a short statement about this that we could build on? I think the issues are: > > - what is the logical community to take this on? (assuming not an institution but a broader coalition including semantic web folks and > vendors) > - can we identify a process? > - what will libraries need to make this a reality? (not that it all can be done right away, but for the purposes of planning) > > ?? There are probably other aspects that we need to cover, so anything else you -- or anyone on the list -- can think of. > > kc > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-lld-request@w3.org [mailto:public-lld-request@w3.org] >> On Behalf Of Karen Coyle >> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 7:50 PM >> To: public-lld >> Subject: Ideas for Recommendations for Report >> >> The working group has fleshed out text on the issues that have been >> identified around LLD, and now wants to gather ideas for >> recommendations that the report can make. Recommendations can be at >> various levels from general to specific, and it would be good to have >> a number of proposals that could result in gains in the short term. >> >> We assume that the recommendations will evolve out of the issues. At >> the high level, the issues we have identified are: >> >> * 1.1 Linked Data is an emerging technology >> * 1.2 Library data is expressed in library-specific formats that >> cannot be easily shared outside the library community >> * 1.3 The library standards process is highly top-down and non-agile >> * 1.4 Current library data practices are expensive (and the true >> costs are unmeasured) >> * 1.5 Library ecosystem is designed for stability and resists change >> * 1.6 Library data may have rights issues that prevent open >> publication >> >> Each section has a fair amount of detail. >> >> As a first pass, the general categories for recommendations are: >> >> * 2.1 Identify costs of current practices, and costs and ROI to >> moving to LLD >> * 2.2 Identify issues for migration to LLD, both technical, >> managerial, and intellectual >> * 2.3 Identify areas where existing library community standards >> and Semantic Web standards require extension or development to support >> LLD >> * 2.4 Identify tools that are needed to support the creation and >> use of LLD >> * 2.5 Analysis for the transformation of current library data to LLD >> o 2.5.1 Deduplication >> * 2.6 Cultivate a research and development environment >> * 2.7 Create educational opportunities >> * 2.8 Include metadata design in library and information science >> education >> * 2.9 Foster a discussion about open data and rights >> >> We expect there to be iteration between the issues and the >> recommendations as we work on this, so if you have a recommendation >> with no issue, or vice-versa, please send it in. >> >> We are asking committee members and anyone else who wishes to begin to >> fill out points in the recommendations area. (We'll turn it into text >> as part of the editing process, so short bullets are ok if they make >> sense.) If you do not have edit access to the wiki, you can air your >> recommendations on this list and we'll gather them. Of course, >> discussion is encouraged. This is the real meat of our report and all >> ideas are welcome. >> >> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Draft_issues_page >> >> -- >> Karen Coyle >> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net >> ph: 1-510-540-7596 >> m: 1-510-435-8234 >> skype: kcoylenet >> >> >> > > > > -- > Karen Coyle > kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net > ph: 1-510-540-7596 > m: 1-510-435-8234 > skype: kcoylenet > >
Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2011 14:28:59 UTC