- From: Adrian Pohl <pohl@hbz-nrw.de>
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:51:14 +0100
- To: <public-lld@w3.org>
Hello, I asked the general question[1] on semanticoverflow (pasted below) whether to use predicates or xsd datatypes to represent in RDF different bibliographic identifiers a record contains. It would be great if you could contribute your thoughts - on semanticoverflow or here... All the best, Adrian [1] http://www.semanticoverflow.com/questions/3572/xsd-or-vocabulary Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (German National Library) and hbz are working on a service[2] which aims to facilitate the linking of data from different catalogues (whether library catalogues or union catalogues) by providing matching information about different records. For this project we - amongst other things - need to link catalog entries to the bibliograhic identifiers in them. (There are a lot of identifiers in the realm of bibliographic data: widely known identifiers like ISBN, ISSN, DOI, URN, Handle, OCLC number, LCCN and many more local, regional and national identifiers. Some of them identify a bibliographic record while others identify the described bibliographic entity - which doesn't make it easier in a LOD context.) The question here is how to represent a link in RDF from a record or a bibliographic resource to the associated identifiers. We have to decide between 1.) using individual predicates for each identifier or 2.) using the global predicate dc:identifier and characterizing the identifier more precisely through an xsd data type. Here is an example for each approach: 1. The "predicate approach" @prefix biro: . @prefix cg: . @prefix dc: . a biro:BibliographicRecord ; dc:source ; cg:bvn "BV035542944" ; cg:oclcn "991052625" ; ex:describes [ cg:isbn "3-8273-2774-1" ] . # ex:describes is because there is no inverse property to wdrs:describedby. # Does anybody know an appropriate predicate for this? 2. The "datatype approach" @prefix biro: . @prefix dc: . a biro:BibliographicRecord ; dc:source ; dc:identifier "BV035542944"^^xsd:BVN ; dc:identifier "991052625"^^xsd:OCLCN ; ex:describes [ dc:identifier "3-8273-2774-1"^^xsd:ISBN ] . What do you think is the way to go: Creating an XSD or a vocabulary? Adrian [2] http://www.hbz-nrw.de/dokumentencenter/presse/pm/culturegraph_en
Received on Thursday, 10 March 2011 20:52:22 UTC