- From: Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 12:28:07 -0500
- To: "Diane I. Hillmann" <metadata.maven@gmail.com>, "Ross Singer" <ross.singer@talis.com>
- Cc: <public-lld@w3.org>
Diane, There is a many-to-many relationship between E&M. Does the toolkit try to detect the presence multiple expressions in a MARC record or does is assume there is only one? Jeff > -----Original Message----- > From: public-lld-request@w3.org [mailto:public-lld-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Diane I. Hillmann > Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 12:00 PM > To: Ross Singer > Cc: public-lld@w3.org > Subject: Re: Question about MARCXML to Models transformation > > > It might be good to note here that the strategy used by the > eXtensible > Catalog Metadata Services Toolkit is to parse the MARC records out into > a WEMI structure, then go back and determine which Works are the same > (and from there, Expressions, etc.), rather than try to determine that > as part of the initial process. This seems to me a good strategy. > > Diane > > On 3/9/11 10:53 AM, Ross Singer wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Richard Light > > <richard@light.demon.co.uk <mailto:richard@light.demon.co.uk>> wrote: > > > > > > This is probably my bibliographic ignorance coming out, so > > apologies if that's the case. I was assuming that "different > > URLs" = "different Expressions". However, from the discussion I'm > > realising that the issue is about how to tease out WEMI from > > records which lack this world view. > > > > Richard, it's understandable - it's a mess! > > > > But this is sort of where I'm getting at. Our best laid plans still > > need to account for the 214 million records (just using Worldcat as > an > > example, meaning there are considerably more) that already exist. > > > > I think the day when we hit the 24 hour period that more RDA > resources > > were created than AACR2 we can begin to start thinking about how > > RDA/FRBRer/etc. begins to shape the way we create linked data. Until > > then, all we have to work with is what we've got. > > > > -Ross. > >
Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2011 17:29:30 UTC