- From: Richard Light <richard@light.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 15:27:08 +0000
- To: Ross Singer <ross.singer@talis.com>
- Cc: "Young,Jeff (OR)" <jyoung@oclc.org>, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, public-lld@w3.org
In message <AANLkTim6XyVtANsMfPSWQY5+XAbFpCew08T_=ASva95n@mail.gmail.com>, Ross Singer <ross.singer@talis.com> writes >On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Richard Light ><richard@light.demon.co.uk> wrote: > >> Well yes, correct. But that's precisely my point: whatever basis was used >> to arrive at that position, they have been assigned different URLs, and ipso >> facto it is asserted that they are distinct entities. I have no view on >> what would count as sufficient information to arrive at that conclusion >> (although the raft of different properties would seem to make it a >> no-brainer in this case). >> >Richard, I'm not sure I understand. They've been assigned different >URLs because they're different records. The problem is, we don't >*why* it's a different record. I don't think it's a "no-brainer" - >the raft of different properties could easily appear because they're >different editions (and, therefore different Manifestations of the >same Expression) or simply because the records were entered by >different people/organizations. This is probably my bibliographic ignorance coming out, so apologies if that's the case. I was assuming that "different URLs" = "different Expressions". However, from the discussion I'm realising that the issue is about how to tease out WEMI from records which lack this world view. Richard -- Richard Light
Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2011 15:28:05 UTC