Re: review of Relevant Technologies

Hi Jeff,

Thanks for editing the section. I found a typo "As a reuslt". :)

Fumi

On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org> wrote:
> Fumi,
>
> Thanks for the review. I tried to incorporate your comments into the
> section. Here's the diff:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_Relevant
> _Technologies&diff=5139&oldid=5137
>
> Jeff
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-lld-request@w3.org [mailto:public-lld-request@w3.org] On
>> Behalf Of Fumihiro Kato
>> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 1:07 AM
>> To: public-lld@w3.org
>> Subject: review of Relevant Technologies
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I reviewed the wiki draft of Relevant Technologies [1] and agreed for
>> the most part.
>>
>> I would like to add a comment for the Content Management Systems and
>> RDFa
>> section. My suggestion is to remove RDFa from the section title in
>> order to expand
>> the scope of this section. It focuses on publishing RDFa on CMS,
>> however, CMS is
>> also useful to consume Linked Data. For instance, Drupal has some
>> plugins like
>> VARQL [2] and SPARQL Views [3] to allow users to query RDF data
> against
>> SPARQL
>> endpoints to show results as HTML Table or other views. This feature
>> makes web
>> contents richer in this sector. This topic may be related to the
>> Benefits section, too.
>>
>> [1]
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Draft_Relevant_Technologies
>> [2] http://drupal.org/project/varql
>> [3] http://drupal.org/project/sparql_views
>>
>> Best,
>> Fumi
>>
>> --
>> Fumihiro Kato <fumi@nii.ac.jp>
>> Researcher, National Institute of Informatics
>>
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 24 June 2011 00:44:41 UTC