RE: review of Relevant Technologies

Fumi,

Thanks for the review. I tried to incorporate your comments into the
section. Here's the diff:

http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_Relevant
_Technologies&diff=5139&oldid=5137

Jeff

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-lld-request@w3.org [mailto:public-lld-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Fumihiro Kato
> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 1:07 AM
> To: public-lld@w3.org
> Subject: review of Relevant Technologies
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I reviewed the wiki draft of Relevant Technologies [1] and agreed for
> the most part.
> 
> I would like to add a comment for the Content Management Systems and
> RDFa
> section. My suggestion is to remove RDFa from the section title in
> order to expand
> the scope of this section. It focuses on publishing RDFa on CMS,
> however, CMS is
> also useful to consume Linked Data. For instance, Drupal has some
> plugins like
> VARQL [2] and SPARQL Views [3] to allow users to query RDF data
against
> SPARQL
> endpoints to show results as HTML Table or other views. This feature
> makes web
> contents richer in this sector. This topic may be related to the
> Benefits section, too.
> 
> [1]
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Draft_Relevant_Technologies
> [2] http://drupal.org/project/varql
> [3] http://drupal.org/project/sparql_views
> 
> Best,
> Fumi
> 
> --
> Fumihiro Kato <fumi@nii.ac.jp>
> Researcher, National Institute of Informatics
>

Received on Thursday, 23 June 2011 15:33:29 UTC