Re: [Use case side-deliverable] Alternative organization to improve readability

Thanks everyone for the comments, I think I will finish some minor editorial
changes and don't move anything in the wiki so, as Karen said (good point!),
we can experiment in the html version to see what could be the best layout
(collapsable elements could help indeed).

Just to clarify, we have two different things here:

1) the one-sentence *short descriptions* in the tables.
2) the short summaries (that provide a longer description) or *abstracts*.

We can play with these two elements but for now I will leave them as they
are in the wiki.

Cheers,

Daniel

2011/8/27 Manue Bermes <manue.fig@gmail.com>

> I would agree with Daniel : it's good to have a short summary in the table,
> and a longer one at the end of the document. It makes the tables easier to
> read.
>
> Emma
>
> Envoyé de mon iPad
>
> Le 27 août 2011 à 02:04, Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de> a écrit :
>
> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:35:45PM -0700, Karen Coyle wrote:
> >> I think it helps to have the summaries as part of the list/table. I
> >> think we can reduce the tables in the html version -- possibly make
> >> them collapsable? Anyway, the tables in the wiki (which I'm
> >> impressed that you did so well!) aren't necessarily the same bulk as
> >> the tables in html. Could we experiment a bit with the html before
> >> you do more work moving them around?
> >
> > I also think it is helpful to keep the summaries in the table.
> >
> > Tom
> >
> >
>
>