VS: Recommendations: URIs from Viljanen Kim on 2011-04-27 (public-lld@w3.org from April 2011)

From: Viljanen Kim <kim.viljanen@aalto.fi>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 11:32:42 +0000
To: Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>, Emmanuelle Bermes <manue@figoblog.org>
CC: "Koster, Lukas" <L.Koster@uva.nl>, "public-lld@w3.org" <public-lld@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4D3A02236A400A47AB3BDEEEF80F24E554EE7CF3@EXMDB05.org.aalto.fi>

+1

We have been discussing this in Finland, too.

Regards,
Kim
________________________________________
Lähettäjä: public-lld-request@w3.org [public-lld-request@w3.org] k&#228;ytt&#228;j&#228;n Jodi Schneider [jodi.schneider@deri.org] puolesta
Lähetetty: 27. huhtikuuta 2011 13:50
Vastaanottaja: Emmanuelle Bermes
Kopio: Koster, Lukas; public-lld@w3.org
Aihe: Re: Recommendations: URIs

On 27 Apr 2011, at 10:27, Emmanuelle Bermes wrote:
Libraries have a story of being concerned with persistence of
identifiers, which has led to the creation of schemes such as DOI,
URN, ARK etc. The advantage is to guarantee the central authority. But
it tends to create undesired complexity. Maybe even if it's a
non-library problem, we should tell libraries that HTTP URIs are OK if
they are managed well.

+1 to that!

-J

Received on Wednesday, 27 April 2011 11:33:14 UTC