Re: Non- and Partial-FRBR Metadata

On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 6:45 AM, Antoine Isaac <> wrote:
> Btw could we use RDF blank nodes as an alternative here? That would bring no
> extra URI, and *if you think you need it*, the ability to have these FRBR
> statements that link the W and the M (and thus to access one from another) .
Yeah, I think this could be a great way to work around the problem.
My only concern (not necessarily based in any facts or evidence, mind
you) might be an impact it might have on SPARQL.  If it doesn't affect
SPARQLing too adversely, I'd say it's a winner.


Received on Friday, 17 September 2010 09:17:38 UTC