- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:46:57 +0200
- To: "Young,Jeff (OR)" <jyoung@oclc.org>
- CC: public-lld <public-lld@w3.org>
Hi Jeff, On that specific one: > I’m also pretty convinced that the http://viaf.org/ontology/1.1/#Heading class needs to be bound to skosxl:Label class in some way (rdfs:subClassOf?). I don’t think it can completely go away, though, because of inconvenient restrictions on the skosxsl:prefLabel and skosxl:altLabel. I guess it would be possible to have viaf:Heading rdfs:subClassOf skosxl:Label, yes. The issue then is the practical value of such a thing to which (SKOS) entity should these label be attached? skosxl:Label are nice per se, but linking them to something using skosxl:prefLabel/altLabel/hiddenLabel makes them much more interesting. http://viaf.org/viaf/102333412 is not a skos:Concept, and I guess it shouldn't be--your decision to have http://viaf.org/viaf/102333412/#skos:Concept linked to it makes this even clearer. So you would attach these xl:Labels to http://viaf.org/viaf/102333412/#skos:Concept ? I guess that can be fine, I don't see any restrictions in SKOS-XL [1] that would prevent it, in fact. Cheers, Antoine [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/skos-xl.html
Received on Friday, 29 October 2010 15:47:08 UTC