- From: Neubert Joachim <J.Neubert@zbw.eu>
- Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:26:23 +0100
- To: "Ed Summers" <ehs@pobox.com>, "public-lld" <public-lld@w3.org>
+1 - seems to avoid some hassles mentioned earlier. Cheers, Joachim -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: public-lld-request@w3.org [mailto:public-lld-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Ed Summers Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. November 2010 22:51 An: public-lld Betreff: Re: SemWeb terminology page Personally, I like the term "RDF Vocabulary" to talk about RDF schemas and OWL ontologies like FOAF, SKOS, DCTERMS, etc. I tend to use "Dataset" from VoID [1] to refer to a bounded collection of web resources e.g. id.loc.gov/authorities, viaf.org, etc. I think one of the lessons from the DCAM is that we should limit the amount of vocabulary we ourselves have to create to talk about things. But that doesn't make for very lengthy dissertations though I guess :-) //Ed [1] http://vocab.deri.ie/void/guide
Received on Thursday, 11 November 2010 08:27:02 UTC