- From: Erik Hetzner <egh@e6h.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 08:55:55 -0700
- To: "public-lld" <public-lld@w3.org>
Hi Jeff, I am about to sign off here, because I do no think that we are going to convince each other, & I imagine list members are getting bored. :) I agree that book is not the clearest concept; the point was that bibo:Book and book/vocab#Book have the same semantic meaning AND it is very easy to imagine defining a resource which has both types. Whether or not FRBR is a better model (I think it is) doesn’t seem relevant. But one final comment: At Fri, 9 Jul 2010 11:03:27 -0400, Young,Jeff (OR) wrote: > > […] > > Jeff: > > <http://example.org/bibo:Book/1> a bibo:Book . > <http://example.org/frbr:Manifestation/1> a frbr:Manifestation . > <http://example.org/bibo:Book/1> owl:sameAs > <http://example.org/frbr:Manifestation/1> . I assume this is not your actual position, since it was owl:sameAs that stared this whole thing. best, Erik
Received on Friday, 9 July 2010 15:56:25 UTC