Re: CBOR-LD musings

On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 6:29 PM Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:
> It would be great to have a discussion on DB’s CBOR-LD spec to understand what it is trying to do.

Sure, and happy to have that discussion (and share the production
deployments we have today for CBOR-LD). The spec is in a fairly
outdated state due to all the other spec work we've been doing that is
under more immediate time pressures. Your commentary on what's missing
today is accurate and we'd like to fix that (and haven't been able to
given all the other time pressures and customer demands).

That said, the CBOR-LD implementation here is in production usage (for
the TruAge program, which is also used by the State of California in
their DMV app):

https://github.com/digitalbazaar/cborld

... and we have a very long and outstanding set of issues to update
the CBOR-LD spec to bring it inline w/ the CBOR-LD implementation we
have and then transfer ownership over to the JSON-LD WG (if there is
consensus to take the work on).

-- manu

-- 
Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
https://www.digitalbazaar.com/

Received on Tuesday, 28 November 2023 00:05:12 UTC