- From: Christopher Johnson <chjohnson39@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 05:29:58 +0200
- To: public-linked-json@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAMJ8WP1zbLR8eYi7idhgPu79P+q3dzbw68Q=cLa18_fYB9A=DQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi list, In am writing tests and possibly a n async document loader implementation for jsonld-java that could check Content-Type and Link headers before fetching. The current one does not. I would like to research and find actual examples where the JSON-LD specification about the Interpretation requirement has been observed. Anyone know a site that serve s Content-Type application/json with a Link header that provides a " http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#context" relation? Also could some one please explain why application/ld+json is forbidden to provide an #context relation with a Link Header? Is an #context relation (if served as application/ld+json) allowed to specify a http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld profile? Or could a non http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld Content-Type profile be served as application/json and provide a secondary #context relation if it were itself an #context ? Should the document loader check (and subsequently dereference the relations) if "second-step" remote documents provide Link and/or Content-Type profile? Should there be a processing "order of precedence"? Just trying to understand required hypermedia options and possible use cases. Thanks, Christopher Johnson Scientific Associate Universitätsbibliothek Leipzig [1] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/39551829/usage-for- profile-parameter-for-json-ld-requests [2] https://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld/#interpreting-json-as-json-ld [3] https://github.com/IIIF/api/issues/1066 [4] https://github.com/ProfileNegotiation/I-D-Accept--Schema
Received on Wednesday, 18 October 2017 03:40:20 UTC