- From: Simeon Warner <simeon.warner@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 04:59:41 -0400
- To: "'JSON-LD CG'" <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Hi all,
I think framing is an important aspect of JSON-LD and I agree with the
introductory comment "Developers typically work with trees, represented
as JSON objects. While mapping a graph to a tree can be done, the layout
of the end result must be specified in advance. A Frame can be used by a
developer on a JSON-LD document to specify a deterministic layout for a
graph." [1]. I would add that not only is a deterministic layout
important, this layout should be as simple as possible (but no simpler
;-) ). We should expect to cater for JSON-only use of the data extracted
from JSON-LD systems, and for a developer working with JSON:
{
"@context": "http://iiif.io/api/image/2/context.json",
"@id": "http://example.org/r1",
"formats": [
"jpg",
"png"
],
"height": 2000,
"width": 2000
}
is much preferable to:
{
"@context": "http://iiif.io/api/image/2/context.json",
"@graph": [
{
"@id": "http://example.org/r1",
"formats": [
"jpg",
"png"
],
"height": 2000,
"width": 2000
}
]
}
To access `width` it is much nicer to write `data.width` than
`data["@graph"][0].width`.
I found some discussion of this issue in 2013 [3] and later in that
thread it seems that the pattern "agreed" upon [4] was to frame and then
compact again to remove the `@graph` construct in cases where one knows
that it can be done:
> compact( frame( flat, frame), context)
>
> produces the desired output :)
(the rest of that thread went on to discuss bnode handling leading to
issue [5]).
I think that there should be a flag/keyword in the frame to control
whether `@graph` is artificially added in the second to last step of the
framing algorithm [2]:
> If compacted results does not have a top-level @graph keyword, or if
its value is not an array, modify compacted results to place the non
@context properties of compacted results into a dictionary contained
within the array value of @graph.
It seems ugly and wasteful to have to run compaction (or some kludge
doing just the needed transformation) in order to remove the `@graph`
construct.
Cheers,
Simeon
[1] http://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld-framing/#introduction
[2] http://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld-framing/#framing-algorithm
[3]
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-linked-json/2013Jul/0143.html
[4]
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-linked-json/2013Aug/0001.html
[5] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/293
Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2016 09:01:44 UTC