Re: Framing and Query

First off, thanks to all of you for this thread, and for the renewed 
interest in JSON-LD Framing!

>>>> Gregg >>> Additionally, the Framing algorithm [2] has proven to be important, but work on the specification was never complete, and
>>> implementations  have moved beyond what was documented in any case.
>>>> Markus >> It is certainly handy but I'm not sure there's agreement on what exactly it should be. Initially it was just (or at least mostly)
>>> about re-framing an existing graph... I think what a lot of people (myself included) actually want and need is to query a graph and control
>>> the serialization of the result. Maybe we should start with a discussion on the role of framing!?

I agree that there is often a need to query and then Frame the result, 
but I'm concerned that bundling both capabilities into one 
syntax/solution might be a mistake at this point.   Framing seems hard 
enough by itself.  Wouldn't it be better to just tackle Framing first, 
and later look at the possibility of bundling a query capability?

David Booth

Received on Thursday, 13 October 2016 02:19:00 UTC