- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 22:58:40 +0200
- To: "'James M Snell'" <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Cc: '☮ elf Pavlik ☮' <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, "'Linked JSON'" <public-linked-json@w3.org>, "'Harry Halpin'" <hhalpin@w3.org>, "'Erik Wilde'" <dret@berkeley.edu>
On 19 Mai 2015 at 21:34, James M Snell wrote: > Markus: are the JSON-LD impls already compliant with this then? They accept all I-JSON-conformant JSON-LD but might emit JSON that doesn't respect all of I-JSON's suggestions. Does that answer your question? > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: >> On 19 Mai 2015 at 17:19, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote: >>> Can anyone see any possible issues with requiring I-JSON while building >>> around JSON-LD? >> >> Nope. I-JSON is basically just a description of what most systems do anyway. >> >> >> Cheers, >> Markus >> >> >> -- >> Markus Lanthaler >> @markuslanthaler -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Thursday, 21 May 2015 20:59:10 UTC