Re: Thoughts on Falcor and JSON Graph

One message re: Falcor on the Hydra list: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-hydra/2015Aug/0020.html

Also, I tweeted asking why JSON Graph instead of JSON LD: https://twitter.com/ariutta/status/636323946594304000

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christoph Dorn" <christoph@christophdorn.com>
> To: "anders riutta" <anders.riutta@gladstone.ucsf.edu>
> Cc: public-linked-json@w3.org
> Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 2:59:07 PM
> Subject: Re: Thoughts on Falcor and JSON Graph
> 
> 
> 
> I am interested in this comparison as well as I am in the process of
> writing a data mapper that can connect JSON data following various
> schemas into a single document.
> 
> Christoph
> 
> 
> On August 25, 2015 05:19:54 pm PDT, "Anders Riutta"
> <anders.riutta@gladstone.ucsf.edu> wrote:
> 
> > Netflix recently released their open-source project Falcor, which
> > "lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain
> > model via a virtual JSON graph." [0] It uses the proposed JSON Graph
> > spec [1] and [2].
> >
> > The specs for JSON Graph and JSON-LD have some overlap, and likewise
> > Falcor has some overlap with the JSON-LD implementations. How do
> > Falcor and JSON Graph relate to JSON-LD? It appears to me they are
> > very similar, except Falcor requires more changes to the backend
> > server but also provides more control over data shape and caching
> > than is currently provided by JSON-LD framing.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Anders Riutta
> >
> > [0] http://netflix.github.io/falcor/
> > [1] https://github.com/jsongraph/json-graph-specification
> > [2] http://netflix.github.io/falcor/documentation/jsongraph.html
> >
> 
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 27 August 2015 00:54:45 UTC