- From: Ryan McDonough <ryan@damnhandy.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 12:16:21 -0400
- To: Arnau Siches <asiches@gmail.com>
- Cc: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, Hydra <public-hydra@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAEy1g=Q_rkmJgYRP+6qd_+FM0wVtX0uFrSEJ70xEYgCfzFHBCw@mail.gmail.com>
Has anyone taken a gander at Netfix's Falcor (aka Flakor, JSON Graph)? It seems similar to in concept to what GraphQL is trying to achieve: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOE6nVVr14c http://www.slideshare.net/InfoQ/reactive-rest The ideas are interesting. The idea of being able to request only the properties you are interested in seems pretty great. This is the one thing folks who are addicted to query languages miss the most when having to shift to a course-grained web API. Everyone seems to want some way of being able to get only the properties their application is interested in. I like the thinking behind Falcor, but the thought of yet another JSON graph representation is disappointing. Ryan- On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Arnau Siches <asiches@gmail.com> wrote: > Related https://github.com/chute/turbine > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Markus Lanthaler > <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote: > > On 2 Jul 2015 at 22:31, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > >> On Thursday, July 02, 2015 7:29 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > >>> FYI: > >>> > >>> http://facebook.github.io/graphql/ > >> > >> Cool, thanks a lot for sharing. > > > > ... and a reference implementation in JavaScript is now also available: > > > > https://github.com/graphql/graphql-js > > > > Unfortunately, it is not a fully standalone GraphQL server but just a > set of base libraries. I haven't checked in detail yet what that means. > > > > > > -- > > Markus Lanthaler > > @markuslanthaler > > > > > > > > -- > Arnau Siches > @arnau_siches > > -- Ryan J. McDonough http://www.damnhandy.com
Received on Sunday, 16 August 2015 16:16:49 UTC