- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:45:50 +0100
- To: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
- Cc: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
No, the ontology would as you say not be inside the context, but within the context document (and thus normally ignored by JSON-LD processors when used as an external context). I am not sure what is the interpretation if you included it within the @context node.. I think extra properties there are ignored at all and thus would not be easily extractable. You might remember this is how we did it for http://w3.org/ns/oa.jsonld (which I made with manual merging in vim ..) On 6 June 2014 17:17, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote: > > Does it need to be /in/ the context itself, or just in the context document? > Remember (as per Open Annotation) that anything outside of @context is > ignored when the JSON-LD document is used as a context. > > > On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes > <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: >> >> Mmh, well spotted! My next challenge is to add JSON-LD as writer and >> reader for owlapi, which should give you: >> >> Reading/writer of JSON-LD owl in Protege >> Conversion from JSON-LD ontology to context >> Embedding of ontology in context (as JSON-LD OWL) >> >> Personally I am most excited about the last one, as it gives you a context >> with documentation embedded. >> >> I am also planning to add some special annotation properties to tweak the >> generation, say to override the term name. >> >> On 6 Jun 2014 16:17, "Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote: >>> >>> On Friday, June 06, 2014 3:38 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: >>> > I have released the first version of owl2jsonld: >>> > >>> > https://github.com/stain/owl2jsonld >>> > >>> > which is a command line tool (and Clojure library) for converting an >>> > RDFS/OWL ontology >>> > >>> > to JSON-LD @contexts. >>> >>> Great work Stian! I haven't tried it yet but I had a quick look at the >>> code at GitHub. Is it correct that it doesn't parse vocabularies expressed >>> in JSON-LD yet? >>> >>> >>> Have a nice weekend, >>> Markus >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Markus Lanthaler >>> @markuslanthaler >>> >>> > > > > -- > Rob Sanderson > Technology Collaboration Facilitator > Digital Library Systems and Services > Stanford, CA 94305 -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of Manchester http://soiland-reyes.com/stian/work/ http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2014 10:46:41 UTC