- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:24:08 +0200
- To: <public-linked-json@w3.org>
On 11 Jul 2014 at 07:25, Andreas Kuckartz wrote: > Are there any best practices on how to deal with the use of different > property names than "@id" (such as "id" or "identifier") and "@type" > (such as "objectType") in addition to not changing them and using > @context for name mapping? Not really, no. > In particular: how could a migration path look like? > > Would it be reasonable to use both, the new and the old property, during > a transition? If it helps to keep old clients working, yes. If the values are exactly the same though and the semantics match, it doesn't make a lot of sense to include both. > (The background of the question is a JSON format which has been existing > for several years, is moving to use JSON-LD and will be further > developed within a W3C WG.) Which format is it? -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2014 14:24:37 UTC