W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > January 2014

Re: SPARQL and JSON-LD

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 14:44:08 +0000
Message-ID: <52DE87B8.8000306@epimorphics.com>
To: public-linked-json@w3.org
So (Markus? :) what would one look like?

	Andy

On 21/01/14 14:08, Ivan Herman wrote:
> Andreas,
>
> to be very factual: no, at this moment there is no official W3C Working Group working on such a formal specification. And I do not know of any plans to do so in the foreseeable future (although I agree that it would be ok to have such a document).
>
> Whether there are groups or individuals doing so, I do not know...
>
> Sincerely
>
> Ivan
>
> On 21 Jan 2014, at 14:35 , Andreas Kuckartz <a.kuckartz@ping.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi Kingsley,
>>
>> thanks for the links and the information.
>>
>>> What isn't offered is a JSON-LD based self-describing SPARQL result
>>> which is a consequence of this not really being part of the SPARQL spec.
>>
>> But a W3C Recommendation similar to this one could be created for JSON-LD:
>>
>> SPARQL 1.1 Query Results JSON Format
>> W3C Recommendation 21 March 2013
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-results-json/
>>
>> Is anyone working on a "SPARQL 1.1 Query Results JSON-LD Format"?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Andreas
>>
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Digital Publishing Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> GPG: 0x343F1A3D
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 21 January 2014 14:44:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:18:40 UTC