- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 14:44:08 +0000
- To: public-linked-json@w3.org
So (Markus? :) what would one look like? Andy On 21/01/14 14:08, Ivan Herman wrote: > Andreas, > > to be very factual: no, at this moment there is no official W3C Working Group working on such a formal specification. And I do not know of any plans to do so in the foreseeable future (although I agree that it would be ok to have such a document). > > Whether there are groups or individuals doing so, I do not know... > > Sincerely > > Ivan > > On 21 Jan 2014, at 14:35 , Andreas Kuckartz <a.kuckartz@ping.de> wrote: > >> Hi Kingsley, >> >> thanks for the links and the information. >> >>> What isn't offered is a JSON-LD based self-describing SPARQL result >>> which is a consequence of this not really being part of the SPARQL spec. >> >> But a W3C Recommendation similar to this one could be created for JSON-LD: >> >> SPARQL 1.1 Query Results JSON Format >> W3C Recommendation 21 March 2013 >> http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-results-json/ >> >> Is anyone working on a "SPARQL 1.1 Query Results JSON-LD Format"? >> >> Cheers, >> Andreas >> > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C > Digital Publishing Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > GPG: 0x343F1A3D > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 21 January 2014 14:44:42 UTC