- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 15:08:33 +0100
- To: Andreas Kuckartz <a.kuckartz@ping.de>
- Cc: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 21 January 2014 14:08:43 UTC
Andreas, to be very factual: no, at this moment there is no official W3C Working Group working on such a formal specification. And I do not know of any plans to do so in the foreseeable future (although I agree that it would be ok to have such a document). Whether there are groups or individuals doing so, I do not know... Sincerely Ivan On 21 Jan 2014, at 14:35 , Andreas Kuckartz <a.kuckartz@ping.de> wrote: > Hi Kingsley, > > thanks for the links and the information. > >> What isn't offered is a JSON-LD based self-describing SPARQL result >> which is a consequence of this not really being part of the SPARQL spec. > > But a W3C Recommendation similar to this one could be created for JSON-LD: > > SPARQL 1.1 Query Results JSON Format > W3C Recommendation 21 March 2013 > http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-results-json/ > > Is anyone working on a "SPARQL 1.1 Query Results JSON-LD Format"? > > Cheers, > Andreas > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Digital Publishing Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 GPG: 0x343F1A3D FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf
Received on Tuesday, 21 January 2014 14:08:43 UTC