W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > January 2014


From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 15:08:33 +0100
Cc: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Message-Id: <DD8ED738-2BE0-47F4-804B-167624920E77@w3.org>
To: Andreas Kuckartz <a.kuckartz@ping.de>

to be very factual: no, at this moment there is no official W3C Working Group working on such a formal specification. And I do not know of any plans to do so in the foreseeable future (although I agree that it would be ok to have such a document).

Whether there are groups or individuals doing so, I do not know...



On 21 Jan 2014, at 14:35 , Andreas Kuckartz <a.kuckartz@ping.de> wrote:

> Hi Kingsley,
> thanks for the links and the information.
>> What isn't offered is a JSON-LD based self-describing SPARQL result
>> which is a consequence of this not really being part of the SPARQL spec.
> But a W3C Recommendation similar to this one could be created for JSON-LD:
> SPARQL 1.1 Query Results JSON Format
> W3C Recommendation 21 March 2013
> http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-results-json/
> Is anyone working on a "SPARQL 1.1 Query Results JSON-LD Format"?
> Cheers,
> Andreas

Ivan Herman, W3C 
Digital Publishing Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
GPG: 0x343F1A3D
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf

Received on Tuesday, 21 January 2014 14:08:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:18:40 UTC