Hi Ashley,
In addition to DERI's vocabulary, perhaps an upper ontology called umbel
and simple-part whole relations might help? It depends on how far you want
to go?
[1] http://umbel.org/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/SimplePartWhole/
-Brent
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Peter Bruhn Andersen <
bruhn.andersen@webspeed.dk> wrote:
>
> Hi Ashley
>
> You might find inspiration from the 'Buildings and Rooms Vocabulary' [1]
> published as a DERI Vocabulary.
>
> Regards,
> Peter
>
> [1] http://vocab.deri.ie/rooms
>
>
> On 14. december 2014 15:31:13, Ashley Davison-White wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> I aim to model a building - a Place - with additional details; for
>> example, a building has several floors, these floors have rooms etc (a
>> generic term could be "area" or similar).
>>
>> My research has shown me that there exists no existing schema for such
>> a thing, but I may be wrong? If there is, then great.
>>
>> Otherwise, is it valid to give a context children of the same item?
>> Taking the "area" basic sample:
>>
>> A Place -> has Several Areas (floors) -> has Several Areas (rooms).
>>
>> Something like below perhaps:
>>
>> {
>> "@context": {
>> "name": "http://schema.org/name",
>> "description": "http://schema.org/description",
>> "place": {
>> "@id": "http://schema.org/Place",
>> "@type": "@id"
>> },
>> "children": {
>> "@reverse": ".../contexts/area.jsonld"
>> }
>> }
>> }
>>
>> This is my first attempt, so I'm not sure if this is correct?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> - Ashley
>>
>
>
Received on Monday, 15 December 2014 16:27:34 UTC