- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 22:24:47 +0200
- To: "'Simon Grant'" <asimong@gmail.com>
- Cc: <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Hi Simon, On Friday, October 04, 2013 2:14 PM, Simon Grant wrote: > On 4 October 2013 12:02, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > > On Friday, October 04, 2013 12:48 PM, Simon Grant > > [...] > > > > > To me (and possibly others) it would be helpful either > > > (a) to put a note in section 5.4 in any case -- not talking about > > > type coercion, but simply noting that @type arrays cannot be used > > > within @context (you don't have to say why at that point), or > > > > > > What about adding a statement saying that using @type in the context > > cannot be sued to specify the node's type but is used for type coercing > > values? I think that would also address the overloading issue > > Something like that would be fine with me, and I think would serve the > purpose as you suggest. I've updated the document to the statement in section 5.4 [1]. Could you please have a look and let me know whether that addresses your concerns. The diff can be found at [2]. Thanks, Markus [1] http://json-ld.org.local/spec/latest/json-ld/#specifying-the-type [2] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/commit/64375381111ff0913de55fb18253038e6d0e6509 -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Monday, 21 October 2013 20:25:19 UTC