- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 14:49:58 +0200
- To: <public-linked-json@w3.org>
On Friday, October 04, 2013 2:14 PM, Simon Grant wrote: > On 4 October 2013 12:02, Markus Lanthaler wrote: >> On Friday, October 04, 2013 12:48 PM, Simon Grant >> [...] >> >> > To me (and possibly others) it would be helpful either >> > (a) to put a note in section 5.4 in any case -- not talking about >> > type coercion, but simply noting that @type arrays cannot be used >> > within @context (you don't have to say why at that point), or >> >> What about adding a statement saying that using @type in the context >> cannot be sued to specify the node's type but is used for type coercing >> values? I think that would also address the overloading issue. > > Something like that would be fine with me, and I think would serve the > purpose as you suggest. Great. I've created ISSUE-301 [1] so that we don't forget to add it once we all agreed on the concrete wording. Thanks again for reporting this, Markus [1] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/301 -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Friday, 4 October 2013 12:50:30 UTC