- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 16:13:19 -0700
- To: "'RDF-WG Group'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, "'Linked JSON'" <public-linked-json@w3.org>
On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 3:43 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote: > (all the http://www.w3.org vocabs are available at https://www.w3.org, > but of course in RDF those are different symbols. I don't know what > to do about that, but we should probably start thinking about it. I > wonder if it makes sense for people to just start trying the https > version of any http URL when they are dereferencing in a sensitive > app. Strictly speaking, there's no requirement that https:foo and > http:foo be related resources, but it seems like a very good and > common practice.) Adding owl:sameAs statements would probably be the right thing to do in that case then I think. Thoughts? Not really sure about the security implications yet. Would be nice to have a sameAs that isn't bi-directional so that http sameAs https doesn't automatically imply https sameAs http. Does something like that exist already? -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2013 23:13:49 UTC