W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > January 2013

RE: Intent to close ISSUE-205

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 14:32:06 +0100
To: "'Pat Hayes'" <phayes@ihmc.us>
Cc: <public-linked-json@w3.org>, "'RDF WG'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <016301cdf324$b7605b50$262111f0$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
> I propose that, in the same spirit, we redefine "resolution" to mean
> "masturbate", but go on using "resolution" as it is more polite.

I think I will continue to use "resolution" :-)

> PS. If you wish, you may take this to be an objection, but as I have
> already redefined "objection" to mean "eats spaghetti on Wednesdays",
> it will not really make a great deal of difference.

Hmm... what would you propose as alternative? Keep using "IRI"? Use "JSON-LD
URL"? Talk about "links" instead and in the few places it actually matters
use IRI? Use a different term altogether?

Markus Lanthaler
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2013 13:32:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:18:35 UTC