- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 09:40:34 -0400
- To: Michael Pizzo <mikep@microsoft.com>
- CC: "public-linked-json@w3.org" <public-linked-json@w3.org>
On 08/27/2013 04:51 PM, Michael Pizzo wrote: > Would the JSON-LD community be open to working with the OData > community to agree on a standard, extensible, namespaced mechanism > that all JSON-based formats could use to extend JSON? Yes, most definitely. :) > We have a real opportunity to align efforts here in defining a common > convention for marking up JSON payloads. +1 for alignment. > JSON-LD adds markup to JSON payloads by defining a set of keywords > that begin with the “@” symbol. JSON-LD parsers understand these > keywords and treat them differently than other properties. Keep in mind that we can 'alias' keywords in JSON-LD. Markus explained how this can be done in his previous email. So, I would imagine that we're further along wrt. alignment than you may think we are. I think all that may be required is the definition of a JSON-LD Context that aliases certain namespaced values in OData. Creating an OData flag for JSON-LD 1.1/2.0 processors may also be an interesting discussion to have. That might allow people using JSON-LD libraries to consume both OData and JSON-LD using the same library. Would you have some time to join us on one of the JSON-LD teleconference calls to hash out a couple of ideas? -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Meritora - Web payments commercial launch http://blog.meritora.com/launch/
Received on Wednesday, 28 August 2013 13:40:56 UTC