- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@hawke.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 13:43:35 -0400
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- CC: 'JSON-LD CG' <public-linked-json@w3.org>
On 08/15/2013 01:19 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > On Wednesday, August 14, 2013 5:18 AM, Manu Sporny wrote: >> Hey all, >> >> I completely forgot about a mandatory 7 day waiting period and the >> requirement for a transition call between LC and CR for the JSON-LD >> specs. There is no way we can hit the Aug 22nd publication date. Sorry >> about that, I screwed up. :( > Too bad > >> The semi-good news is that it doesn't require this group to really do >> anything but wait for the W3C process to do its thing. >> >> Markus, you and I will need to change the date on the specs to the new >> publication date, which will be negotiated over the next 2 weeks. No >> other spec changes are necessary. You will probably need to be on the >> transition call to answer detailed questions about changes to the >> JSON-LD API. > OK > > >> I'll be prepping the transition meeting documents over the next couple >> of days and will send a link to them out to this group and the RDF WG. >> In the best case, there will be around a 2 week delay in publishing the >> Candidate Rec documents... worst case, 4 weeks. Sorry for the mix-up >> folks. > Perhaps we can shorten the CR period to compensate this delay a bit given that we already have more than enough implementations!? Another option to consider is skipping CR and going to straight to PR. If the CR exit criteria have already been met, this can be done. Speaking of which, what are the planned CR exit criteria, and what's the plan for dealing with the dependency on Futures/Promises? -- Sandro > > -- > Markus Lanthaler > @markuslanthaler > >
Received on Sunday, 18 August 2013 18:47:21 UTC