- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 23:31:50 +0200
- To: "'JSON-LD CG'" <public-linked-json@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Dan Brickley'" <danbri@danbri.org>
On Thursday, August 15, 2013 11:10 PM, Dan Brickley wrote: > On 15 August 2013 21:57, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > On Thursday, August 15, 2013 7:44 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote: >> On 08/15/2013 01:19 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: >> > Perhaps we can shorten the CR period to compensate this delay a bit >> > given that we already have more than enough implementations!? >> >> Another option to consider is skipping CR and going to straight to PR. >> If the CR exit criteria have already been met, this can be done. > > Just as a (poorly sourced) data point, afaik the Google JSON-LD parser > doesn't do anything with remote contexts. A CR period seems one way > of finding out. Does that mean that Google would send in an implementation report? I don't think that we really need a formal CR phase for this. Sending out a request for implementation reports to the mailing lists would achieve almost the same. -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Thursday, 15 August 2013 21:32:20 UTC