W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > August 2013

Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, August 13th 2013

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:35:20 -0700
Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Message-Id: <335A3DA4-2930-4F4A-A23A-4E74A3CE8182@greggkellogg.com>
To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
On Aug 13, 2013, at 9:44 AM, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote:

> Here is an alternate wording that I think should address the concern that Markus expressed on today's call:
> [[
> JSON-LD is a concrete RDF syntax as described in [RDF11-CONCEPTS]. Hence, a JSON-LD document is an RDF document /and/ a JSON document and correspondingly represents an instance of an RDF data model.  However, JSON-LD also extends the RDF data model to optionally allow JSON-LD to serialize Generalized RDF Datasets. The JSON-LD extensions to the RDF data model are:
> ]]
> 
> Let me know what you think.

+1

Gregg

> Thanks,
> David
> 
> On 08/11/2013 11:35 PM, David Booth wrote:
>> I am dismayed to discover that somehow my last message must have gotten
>> lost last week one time when my laptop lost power.  I don't see a trace
>> of it anywhere.  I just discovered this when I looked at the document to
>> verify that my suggested changes had been incorporated, and of course
>> they hadn't . . . because you never received them.  :(
>> 
>> I was going to suggest a small edit to smooth out a couple of minor
>> glitches at the beginning of Section 9 that are probably the result of
>> previous edits.  The existing text is:
>> http://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld/#relationship-to-rdf
>> [[
>> JSON-LD is a concrete RDF syntax as described in [RDF11-CONCEPTS].
>> Hence, a JSON-LD document is an RDF document and a JSON document and
>> correspondingly represents an instance of an RDF data model, namely
>> generalized RDF Datasets. The extensions to the RDF data model are:
>> ]]
>> 
>> The two minor glitches are: (a) the text says that JSON-LD serializes a
>> *generalized* RDF Dataset, but by default it is a standard RDF Dataset;
>> and (b) it mentions "the extensions" before saying that there are
>> extensions.  I think the following text would fix these glitches and
>> make it a little clearer:
>> 
>> [[
>> JSON-LD is a concrete RDF syntax as described in [RDF11-CONCEPTS].
>> Hence, a JSON-LD document is an RDF document /and/ a JSON document and
>> correspondingly represents an instance of an RDF data model.  However,
>> JSON-LD can also optionally extend the RDF data model to serialize
>> Generalized RDF Datasets. The JSON-LD extensions to the RDF data model are:
>> ]]
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> David
>> 
>> On 08/11/2013 09:21 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
>>> The meeting this week will focus on reviewing the JSON-LD specifications
>>> for a Candidate Recommendation publication by the RDFa WG.
>>> 
>>> Information on how to join the call and previous minutes and audio logs
>>> can be found here:
>>> 
>>> http://json-ld.org/minutes/
>>> 
>>> The preliminary agenda is below. Please respond to this e-mail if you
>>> want to add something to the Agenda or if you have any questions.
>>> 
>>> ==========
>>> Tuesday, August 13th, 2013
>>> Time: 7am San Francisco, 10am Boston, 4pm CET
>>> Digital Bazaar Telecon Bridge
>>>    SIP: json-ld@digitalbazaar.com
>>>    Phone US: +1.540.961.4469 x6303
>>> irc://freenode.net/#json-ld
>>> Duration: 60 minutes
>>> Scribes: Niklas, Gregg, Dave, Manu, Markus
>>> ==========
>>> 
>>> Agenda
>>> 
>>> 1. Review of JSON-LD 1.0 CR-ready specification
>>>    * http://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld/
>>> 2. Review JSON-LD 1.0 API CR-ready specification
>>>    * http://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld-api/
>>> 3. Decision to take JSON-LD to Candidate Rec phase
>>> 
>>> -- manu
>>> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2013 18:35:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:18:39 UTC