- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:35:20 -0700
- To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
On Aug 13, 2013, at 9:44 AM, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote: > Here is an alternate wording that I think should address the concern that Markus expressed on today's call: > [[ > JSON-LD is a concrete RDF syntax as described in [RDF11-CONCEPTS]. Hence, a JSON-LD document is an RDF document /and/ a JSON document and correspondingly represents an instance of an RDF data model. However, JSON-LD also extends the RDF data model to optionally allow JSON-LD to serialize Generalized RDF Datasets. The JSON-LD extensions to the RDF data model are: > ]] > > Let me know what you think. +1 Gregg > Thanks, > David > > On 08/11/2013 11:35 PM, David Booth wrote: >> I am dismayed to discover that somehow my last message must have gotten >> lost last week one time when my laptop lost power. I don't see a trace >> of it anywhere. I just discovered this when I looked at the document to >> verify that my suggested changes had been incorporated, and of course >> they hadn't . . . because you never received them. :( >> >> I was going to suggest a small edit to smooth out a couple of minor >> glitches at the beginning of Section 9 that are probably the result of >> previous edits. The existing text is: >> http://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld/#relationship-to-rdf >> [[ >> JSON-LD is a concrete RDF syntax as described in [RDF11-CONCEPTS]. >> Hence, a JSON-LD document is an RDF document and a JSON document and >> correspondingly represents an instance of an RDF data model, namely >> generalized RDF Datasets. The extensions to the RDF data model are: >> ]] >> >> The two minor glitches are: (a) the text says that JSON-LD serializes a >> *generalized* RDF Dataset, but by default it is a standard RDF Dataset; >> and (b) it mentions "the extensions" before saying that there are >> extensions. I think the following text would fix these glitches and >> make it a little clearer: >> >> [[ >> JSON-LD is a concrete RDF syntax as described in [RDF11-CONCEPTS]. >> Hence, a JSON-LD document is an RDF document /and/ a JSON document and >> correspondingly represents an instance of an RDF data model. However, >> JSON-LD can also optionally extend the RDF data model to serialize >> Generalized RDF Datasets. The JSON-LD extensions to the RDF data model are: >> ]] >> >> Thanks, >> David >> >> On 08/11/2013 09:21 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: >>> The meeting this week will focus on reviewing the JSON-LD specifications >>> for a Candidate Recommendation publication by the RDFa WG. >>> >>> Information on how to join the call and previous minutes and audio logs >>> can be found here: >>> >>> http://json-ld.org/minutes/ >>> >>> The preliminary agenda is below. Please respond to this e-mail if you >>> want to add something to the Agenda or if you have any questions. >>> >>> ========== >>> Tuesday, August 13th, 2013 >>> Time: 7am San Francisco, 10am Boston, 4pm CET >>> Digital Bazaar Telecon Bridge >>> SIP: json-ld@digitalbazaar.com >>> Phone US: +1.540.961.4469 x6303 >>> irc://freenode.net/#json-ld >>> Duration: 60 minutes >>> Scribes: Niklas, Gregg, Dave, Manu, Markus >>> ========== >>> >>> Agenda >>> >>> 1. Review of JSON-LD 1.0 CR-ready specification >>> * http://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld/ >>> 2. Review JSON-LD 1.0 API CR-ready specification >>> * http://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld-api/ >>> 3. Decision to take JSON-LD to Candidate Rec phase >>> >>> -- manu >>> >
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2013 18:35:51 UTC