W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > August 2013

Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, August 13th 2013

From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:44:26 -0400
Message-ID: <520A626A.70209@dbooth.org>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
CC: Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Here is an alternate wording that I think should address the concern 
that Markus expressed on today's call:
[[
JSON-LD is a concrete RDF syntax as described in [RDF11-CONCEPTS]. 
Hence, a JSON-LD document is an RDF document /and/ a JSON document and 
correspondingly represents an instance of an RDF data model.  However, 
JSON-LD also extends the RDF data model to optionally allow JSON-LD to 
serialize Generalized RDF Datasets. The JSON-LD extensions to the RDF 
data model are:
]]

Let me know what you think.

Thanks,
David

On 08/11/2013 11:35 PM, David Booth wrote:
> I am dismayed to discover that somehow my last message must have gotten
> lost last week one time when my laptop lost power.  I don't see a trace
> of it anywhere.  I just discovered this when I looked at the document to
> verify that my suggested changes had been incorporated, and of course
> they hadn't . . . because you never received them.  :(
>
> I was going to suggest a small edit to smooth out a couple of minor
> glitches at the beginning of Section 9 that are probably the result of
> previous edits.  The existing text is:
> http://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld/#relationship-to-rdf
> [[
> JSON-LD is a concrete RDF syntax as described in [RDF11-CONCEPTS].
> Hence, a JSON-LD document is an RDF document and a JSON document and
> correspondingly represents an instance of an RDF data model, namely
> generalized RDF Datasets. The extensions to the RDF data model are:
> ]]
>
> The two minor glitches are: (a) the text says that JSON-LD serializes a
> *generalized* RDF Dataset, but by default it is a standard RDF Dataset;
> and (b) it mentions "the extensions" before saying that there are
> extensions.  I think the following text would fix these glitches and
> make it a little clearer:
>
> [[
> JSON-LD is a concrete RDF syntax as described in [RDF11-CONCEPTS].
> Hence, a JSON-LD document is an RDF document /and/ a JSON document and
> correspondingly represents an instance of an RDF data model.  However,
> JSON-LD can also optionally extend the RDF data model to serialize
> Generalized RDF Datasets. The JSON-LD extensions to the RDF data model are:
> ]]
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> On 08/11/2013 09:21 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
>> The meeting this week will focus on reviewing the JSON-LD specifications
>> for a Candidate Recommendation publication by the RDFa WG.
>>
>> Information on how to join the call and previous minutes and audio logs
>> can be found here:
>>
>> http://json-ld.org/minutes/
>>
>> The preliminary agenda is below. Please respond to this e-mail if you
>> want to add something to the Agenda or if you have any questions.
>>
>> ==========
>> Tuesday, August 13th, 2013
>> Time: 7am San Francisco, 10am Boston, 4pm CET
>> Digital Bazaar Telecon Bridge
>>     SIP: json-ld@digitalbazaar.com
>>     Phone US: +1.540.961.4469 x6303
>> irc://freenode.net/#json-ld
>> Duration: 60 minutes
>> Scribes: Niklas, Gregg, Dave, Manu, Markus
>> ==========
>>
>> Agenda
>>
>> 1. Review of JSON-LD 1.0 CR-ready specification
>>     * http://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld/
>> 2. Review JSON-LD 1.0 API CR-ready specification
>>     * http://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld-api/
>> 3. Decision to take JSON-LD to Candidate Rec phase
>>
>> -- manu
>>
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2013 16:44:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:18:39 UTC