Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, November 13th 2012

I let Manu know this, but I have an appointment which I will be leaving for
around 10:30 EST (after the first half hour of the call). If my feedback is
needed for the @annotation and @graph issues, it might be better to either
do that in the beginning or bump that to next week.

Cheers,
Lin


On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Markus Lanthaler
<markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> > There has been a flurry of activity on the JSON-LD issue tracker, which
> > is great - lots of progress being made. We have a few outstanding
> > issues
> > that probably need telecon time to be resolved, the biggest of which is
> > the Drupal use case for language maps, annotations, and/or graphs. This
> > week will be a 90-minute call.
>
> I would like to resolve those issues at the beginning of the call. Here
> are all issues we have concrete proposals for and seem to have consensus:
>
> -- Syntax Spec --
>
> ISSUE-165: Allow @id: null to decouple a term from @vocab
> ISSUE-166: Add a conformance section
> ISSUE-169: Clarify the meaning of multiple node definitions with the same
> @id
> ISSUE-180: Make link to RDF more apparent in the specification
> ISSUE-181: Limit divergence between JSON-LD and RDF data models
> ISSUE-182: Graph vs DataSet
> ISSUE-189: Support of {@type:{@id:xxx}} constructs
> ISSUE-133: Add '@language' container type (related to ISSUE-159)
>
> -- API Spec --
>
> ISSUE-178: Consider renaming JSON-LD API to JSON-LD Core Processing
> ISSUE-179: Consider moving WebIDL to Appendix or Note
> ISSUE-184: Definition of JSON-LD processor in the Syntax doc
>
> Since not everyone voted directly in the issue tracker I would like to
> resolve them on today's telecon so that we can start updating the specs
> accordingly. It looks like a lot but I think we can resolve all of this
> quite quickly (half an hour maybe).
>
>
> Thanks,
> Markus
>
>
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
>
>
>


-- 
Lin Clark
Drupal Consultant

lin-clark.com
twitter.com/linclark