- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 16:18:08 -0400
- To: François Daoust <francois@joshfire.com>
- CC: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, Josh Mandel <Joshua.Mandel@childrens.harvard.edu>, Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
François, I think you make good points. I re-opened the issue at [1]. We can continue the conversation on that issue.
Gregg
[1] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/26
On May 24, 2012, at 10:11 AM, François Daoust wrote:
> Hi Markus, Josh, Gregg,
>
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Markus Lanthaler
> <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote:
>>> I think François is advocating for `@vocab` for the same
>>> reason we have prefixes: to avoid having to explicitly define
>>> *every* predicate with the same prefix. (It's not "built-in,"
>>> it's established in a context.) The special thing about
>>> `@vocab` is to establish an *empty* prefix, with no colon.
>>> And this might sound trivial (?), but colons make property
>>> names really annoying to work with in JavaScript.
>>>
>>> E.g. with @vocab the SMART context could be ~1k instead of 16k
>>
>> Oh sorry.. then I completely misunderstood his mail.
>
> Dammit. And I thought I was clear ;)
> Thanks for the clarification Josh, that is indeed what I meant. See my
> previous email.
>
>
>>> "Alert": {
>>> "@id": "http://smartplatforms.org/terms#Alert"
>>
>> You know that you can use prefixes in the context as well!? Something like
>>
>> {
>> "@context": {
>> "spt": "http://smartplatforms.org/terms#",
>> "Alert": "spt:Alert",
>> ...
>> },
>> .. data (not using prefix) ..
>> }
>>
>>
>> I'm still not convinced that @vocab would be a good idea.. there are many
>> ways to solve this in an application but of course it depends on the
>> application's specific requirements.
>
> Hmm, I can only think of 2 main ways:
> 1. list properties in the @context.
> 2. parse the created JSON-LD before running the framing algorithm to
> create the @context on-the-fly; or use a specific implementation
> framing algorithm that makes certain assumptions on the @context
>
> That's why I propose @vocab as a third possible way. Now I agree that
> introducing new ways of doing something is not necessarily a good
> thing.
>
> Best,
> Francois.
>
>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Markus Lanthaler
>> @markuslanthaler
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2012 20:19:58 UTC