- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 02:12:54 +0100
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: RDF Comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>, Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
On 24 May 2012, at 01:58, Manu Sporny wrote: > The JSON model is capable of round-tripping the RDF model. The RDF model > is not capable of round-tripping the JSON model. That should not be an issue — trying to round-trip HTML+RDFa loses the pure-HTML parts too, for example. > In order for the RDF > model to support round-tripping the JSON model - it would have to > support null-able subjects What's that? Just property-value pairs without a subject? > and it would have to support plain literal predicates. Right. Why not just stick them onto the end of some standard namespace? > I would be fine with this language: > > JSON-LD is a language that is capable of expressing the RDF model and > performing full JSON-LD to RDF to JSON-LD round-tripping. Shouldn't that be RDF to JSON-LD to RDF? So how about: JSON-LD is a language capable of serializing any RDF graph, and performing full RDF to JSON-LD to RDF round-tripping. Best, Richard > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: PaySwarm Website for Developers Launched > http://digitalbazaar.com/2012/02/22/new-payswarm-alpha/ >
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2012 01:13:25 UTC