- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 18:06:51 +0200
- To: "'Kuno Woudt'" <kuno@frob.nl>, <public-linked-json@w3.org>
> To turn this into linked data the ids would somehow have to be turned > into full IRIs. So fcbcdc39-8851-4efc-a02a-ab0e13be224f, which is a > recording would need to become: > > http://musicbrainz.org/recording/fcbcdc39-8851-4efc-a02a-ab0e13be224f#_ > > And abcd76db-7d5f-3eb7-b386-051c97bfe2e4 should become > > http://musicbrainz.org/release/abcd76db-7d5f-3eb7-b386-051c97bfe2e4#_ ... and you definitely don't wanna include the full (or at least a relative) IRI in the JSON document? Any specific reasons for that? > I fear this is a transformation which cannot be described in a > "@context", is that correct? Any suggestions? That's true. We discussed that some time ago [1] but decided to not support it at this point in time. If you could give us some more insights on why you don't use an IRI directly we might reopen that issue. [1] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/108 -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Tuesday, 10 July 2012 16:07:26 UTC