- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 22:55:59 +0800
- To: <public-linked-json@w3.org>
> IMO, {"@literal": "foo"} means that there is no language, using
> {"@literal": "foo", "@language": null} seems excessively verbose, and
> null is not needed anywhere else. The @language in the context applies
> to plain strings.
Would that then in your opinion also mean that, e.g., all type coercions for
that property are ignored? I'm not a big fan of these kinds of "magic".
Setting it specifically to null would describe in a crystal clear way what
an author intends to do and everyone would IMO understand what it means
without reading the spec.
--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler
Received on Saturday, 21 January 2012 14:56:37 UTC