RE: Simplify "Multiple Typed Literals for a Single Property" (ISSUE-33) from Markus Lanthaler on 2011-09-29 (public-linked-json@w3.org from September 2011)

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:25:11 +0200
To: <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Cc: "'Gregg Kellogg'" <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
Message-ID: <000a01cc7e89$b0e886f0$12b994d0$@lanthaler@gmx.net>

> In such case, I would probably se t the datatype in @coerce. While not
> unreasonable, this would complicate the processing instructions a bit.

True! Maybe we should just change the example to make more sense or, perhaps
even better, drop it altogether.
I thought quite a bit about it but I couldn't come up with a reasonable
example for it so far.


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler

Received on Thursday, 29 September 2011 09:25:42 UTC