Re: Compact forms of language literals

Oh, I instinctively assumed it would be part of the @context. -1 on
any proposition different from that. +1 for putting @language in the
@context.

On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:11, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>
> On Sep 11, 2011, at 23:27 , Markus Lanthaler wrote:
>
>>> 1. Add JSON-LD support for declaring a document-wide language
>>> directive (within the context or at the top level, i.e. where
>>> "@context" and the optional "@base" appear). This is for scenarios
>>> where there is one dominant language for a given resource.
>>>
>>> This would enable us to use @language like this:
>>>
>>>  {
>>>    "@context": ...,
>>>    "@language": "en",
>>>    "@subject": "http://example.org/",
>>>    "title": "The Example"
>>>  }
>>
>> +1 but perhaps we should move @language into the context description. The
>> "meaning" of the document is described in the context so I think that's the
>> place to be for the @language tag as well.
>
> I would also feel it more natural if this was part of the @context. It would also make it clear/clean that children of a node would inherit the language setting, just like any other contextual settings.
>
> Ivan
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Markus Lanthaler
>> @markuslanthaler
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Thomas Steiner, Research Scientist, Google Inc.
http://blog.tomayac.com, http://twitter.com/tomayac

Received on Monday, 12 September 2011 10:27:19 UTC