- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 21:00:23 +0200
- To: linked-data-api-discuss@googlegroups.com
- Cc: public-linked-json@w3.org
On 3 September 2011 20:14, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > Danny, > > I assume you've looked through the archives of this mailing list? The issue > of Linked Data has been long thrashed out with regards to JSON-LD. This > effort culminated in a requirements document [1] . > > Links: > > 1. http://json-ld.org/requirements/latest/ -- note sections on Linked Data . Right, my bad, I had overlooked: 9. An IRI that is a label in a linked data graph should be dereferencable to a Linked Data document describing the labeled subject, object or property. But that's still only in the requirements - where is it fulfilled? The examples in the spec don't yet take this into account. It would be pretty easy to deal with, e.g. by inserting a little text before the existing example in 2.3 along the lines of: [[ Manu is identified by the URI http://manu.sporny.org/people#me. Dereferencing that URI with a HTTP GET can produce a representation like ... ]] (btw, I haven't looked through the archives much, but I was in on a telecon when part of the thrashing out of that definition took place :) Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com
Received on Saturday, 3 September 2011 19:01:01 UTC