- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 18:32:13 +0200
- To: Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: public-linked-json@w3.org
On 1 September 2011 17:48, Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > On 09/01/2011 11:32 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: >> In my opinion, splitting the spec would definitely be beneficial +1 >> Please note that I'm strictly against about having a basic and an advanced >> spec. Think of it more as "separation of concerns". > > +1 +1 http://json-ld.org/ makes a good hub, I'm sure plenty of people will blog intro material > I will also add that I wouldn't be against Ivan's suggestion that a > processor that only implements RDF conversion (vs. the other JSON-LD API > calls) be considered conformant. I think the "Implementor's Spec" should > allow for processors to implement either the four JSON-LD API calls, RDF > conversion, or both. If the RDF side isn't there, there's nothing really to distinguish this from any other arbitrary JSON dialect. It's a feature! Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com
Received on Thursday, 1 September 2011 16:32:41 UTC