W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > September 2011

Re: Split JSON-LD spec

From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 18:32:13 +0200
Message-ID: <CAM=Pv=SvAAQwzX1_HRKsBDQmVzRm-GisErb+Ad2+Q0YO1dQC4g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>
Cc: public-linked-json@w3.org
On 1 September 2011 17:48, Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
> On 09/01/2011 11:32 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:

>> In my opinion, splitting the spec would definitely be beneficial


>> Please note that I'm strictly against about having a basic and an advanced
>> spec. Think of it more as "separation of concerns".
> +1

http://json-ld.org/ makes a good hub, I'm sure plenty of people will
blog intro material

> I will also add that I wouldn't be against Ivan's suggestion that a
> processor that only implements RDF conversion (vs. the other JSON-LD API
> calls) be considered conformant. I think the "Implementor's Spec" should
> allow for processors to implement either the four JSON-LD API calls, RDF
> conversion, or both.

If the RDF side isn't there, there's nothing really to distinguish
this from any other arbitrary JSON dialect. It's a feature!


Received on Thursday, 1 September 2011 16:32:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:18:32 UTC