- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 18:47:00 +0200
- To: "'Gregg Kellogg'" <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Cc: "'Linked JSON'" <public-linked-json@w3.org>
> > PROPOSAL: > > Do not differentiate between JSON-LD Context documents and JSON-LD > instance documents. If @context is specified in a JSON-LD document and > a remote document is listed, the remote document's @context element is > merged into the current active context. If there is no @context element > in the remote document, the active context remains unchanged. > > +1, but we'll need to be more explicit in the processing steps. We also > need to introduce the array notation to specify multiple contexts for a > single key. Yes, of course. The sake of this email was to explain what we talked about yesterday as a first step towards consensus. I didn't want to create more confusion by conflate this issue with the one of having multiple contexts. -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2011 16:47:37 UTC