Re: ISSUE-30 - JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2011-10-04

On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Gregg Kellogg <> wrote:
> On Oct 5, 2011, at 8:14 AM, "Markus Lanthaler" <> wrote:
>> Following up on ISSUE-30: Distinguishing @context documents.
>> ...
>> Do not differentiate between JSON-LD Context documents and JSON-LD instance documents. If @context is specified in a JSON-LD document and a remote document is listed, the remote document's @context element is merged into the current active context. If there is no @context element in the remote document, the active context remains unchanged.
> +1, but we'll need to be more explicit in the processing steps. We also need to introduce the array notation to specify multiple contexts for a single key.

I'm guessing the processing algorithm will be to process array
@contexts in order and you merge each new context (local or remote) on
top of the current context state.  If so, that seems fine to me.


Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2011 20:09:41 UTC