- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:53:01 +0100
- To: public-linked-json@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4E0844ED.9010603@openlinksw.com>
On 6/27/11 1:54 AM, glenn mcdonald wrote: > > Glenn, Brian, Kingsley, > > Is this more along the lines of what you had in mind? > > http://json-ld.org/spec/latest/basic/ > > > Well, there's less of it, so in that sense it's more /like/ what I had > in mind. But I actually wanted a simple specification, not a subset of > a complex specification. There's a big difference. You have to be > willing to actually throw some stuff out, not just move it under a > different subheading. I think this still reads like an RDF appendix, > rather than a JSON addendum. > > Manu, Making a spec that is distinct from RDF will not render RDF useless or deal it a negative blow. In fact, such a spec will ultimately provide context for RDF appreciation. Let's have a simple spec for making graphs using EAV/SPO 3-tuples (triples) where Hyperlinks are used as a Naming mechanism for Objects, an Addressing mechanism for their Representations, and Reference values re. "Value" or "Object" slots. When people start constructing Linked Data graphs on global scale courtesy of tools that exploit what's outlined above, RDF will become more interesting based on the fidelity it brings to the table re. data types and locale matters. Again, an RDFer worth his or her salt can make an RDF based Linked Data graph or an RDF graph (no Name resolution obligation i.e., Identifiers are opaque) from structured data in this form. In my world view, strength is expressed via openness that is ultimately never compromises on choice. We have to let people choose how they pursue Linked Data graph construction. We should never covertly mandate or imply that RDF is inextricably bound to this endeavor. That's simply wrong and utterly inconsistent with true openness. If a simply Linked Data spec is delivered, it will gain traction fast. If its littered with RDF innuendo it will stall, due to the same old RDF inertia factors. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Monday, 27 June 2011 08:53:37 UTC