W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > July 2011

Re: "LD", consensus achieved.

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:47:04 -0400
Message-ID: <4E31BCB8.20205@openlinksw.com>
To: public-linked-json@w3.org
On 7/28/11 3:42 PM, Nathan wrote:
> Think we can call a stop to this one now.. :)
>
> Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>> On 7/28/11 3:28 PM, Danny Ayers wrote:
>>> On 28 July 2011 20:45, Dave Longley<dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>  wrote:
>>>> I would be fine with "JSON for Linking Data".
>>> Me too.
>>
>> Me too re:
>>
>> 1. "JSON for Linking Data" or;
>> 2. "LD" meaning "Linked Data" where we leverage the use of *SHOULD* 
>> re. de-referencavble IRIs to accommodate Blank Node edge cases.
>>
>
>
>
Yes!



-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
President&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Thursday, 28 July 2011 19:47:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:18:30 UTC