W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > July 2011

"LD", consensus achieved.

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 20:42:27 +0100
Message-ID: <4E31BBA3.40709@webr3.org>
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
CC: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>, public-linked-json@w3.org, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Think we can call a stop to this one now.. :)

Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> On 7/28/11 3:28 PM, Danny Ayers wrote:
>> On 28 July 2011 20:45, Dave Longley<dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>  wrote:
>>> I would be fine with "JSON for Linking Data".
>> Me too.
> 
> Me too re:
> 
> 1. "JSON for Linking Data" or;
> 2. "LD" meaning "Linked Data" where we leverage the use of *SHOULD* re. 
> de-referencavble IRIs to accommodate Blank Node edge cases.
> 
Received on Thursday, 28 July 2011 19:43:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:18:30 UTC