"LD", consensus achieved.

Think we can call a stop to this one now.. :)

Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> On 7/28/11 3:28 PM, Danny Ayers wrote:
>> On 28 July 2011 20:45, Dave Longley<dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>  wrote:
>>> I would be fine with "JSON for Linking Data".
>> Me too.
> 
> Me too re:
> 
> 1. "JSON for Linking Data" or;
> 2. "LD" meaning "Linked Data" where we leverage the use of *SHOULD* re. 
> de-referencavble IRIs to accommodate Blank Node edge cases.
> 

Received on Thursday, 28 July 2011 19:43:21 UTC