- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:24:21 -0400
- To: public-linked-json@w3.org
On 7/28/11 12:04 PM, Nathan wrote: > Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> ... Also look at the HTTP protocol, it too is "Deceptively Simple". >> >> "Deceptively Simple" works cos it scales. "Simply Simple" doesn't >> work cos it doesn't scale. >> >> What kind of "simple" do we seek re. JSON-LD ? > > The above is a very good question, what /kind/ of simple do /we/ seek > with JSON-LD? > > I'm sure we're all familiar with notions that simpler is better, and > famous quotes such as "Perfection is achieved, not when there is > nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away." > > One could argue that the "simple" from JSON has been removed with > JSON-LD, and that it is quite complex - I do understand why of course > - but just how much could we remove? What's the bare minimum needed to > cover 80%+ of the use cases? The 80-20 rule is ultimately the crux of the matter! +1000 Kingsley > > Best, > > Nathan > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Thursday, 28 July 2011 16:24:44 UTC