- From: Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:51:34 -0400
- To: public-linked-json@w3.org
On 07/27/2011 08:47 PM, Nathan wrote: > Dave Longley wrote: >> On 07/27/2011 01:48 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> How about: >>> >>> 1. JSON-*D -- in some form courtesy of Alex's post re. blank nodes >>> accomodation >>> >>> 2. JSONG -- JSON Graphs (it does have rhythm to it) >>> >>> 3. JSON-XD -- "X" is whatever you want to make of it without >>> breaking anything via conflation . >>> >>> >> >> I have thought about something that indicates "Graphs in JSON" >> before, so if we must rename the spec then something along the lines >> of JSONG would be alright with me. The only problem, in particular >> with JSONG, is that it is difficult to differentiate it from JSON >> when pronounced, if pronounced "JAY-SONG". >> > > We do need to remember that it's only a particular kind of graph > though, a labelled di-graph. Mentioning because there will be lots of > other people passing over generic graphs in JSON for use with charts > and diagrams, who may easily get confused if we go down the "graphs in > JSON" route. > > Interestingly, Labelled Directed Graph also reduces to LD / LDG. That might be a good compromise. JSON, Labeled and Directed: JSON-LD. And it's easy to remember that if you want to express Linked Data in JSON, you use JSON-LD -- even if that isn't strictly the origin of its name. -- Dave Longley CTO Digital Bazaar, Inc.
Received on Thursday, 28 July 2011 00:51:57 UTC