- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:52:49 -0400
- To: public-linked-json@w3.org
On 07/21/2011 11:48 AM, Dean Landolt wrote: > To me it's the difference between in-band and out-of-band schema -- you > could just as easily use a separate schema to layer IRIs on top of plain > strings. When writing code against a graph nobody /really/ wants to look > at it as IRIs -- we all prefer to assign sane string identifiers to > variables in our code, why not our graphs? I think that's what we're doing, Dean - assigning sane strings IDs to the JSON-SD markup and relying on the context to expand those values out into full IRIs (if necessary) and compact them back down. Go here: http://json-ld.org/playground/ Click "Person" and then click between "Compacted" and "Expanded" form. Are you proposing something different? If so, what are you proposing? -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Uber Comparison of RDFa, Microformats and Microdata http://manu.sporny.org/2011/uber-comparison-rdfa-md-uf/
Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2011 02:53:28 UTC